#39 – Computerized Voting Machines are Safe and Secure. Period.


img_4479

EFFECTED USERS: Every breathing American.

Hair of fire 5 of 5

SUMMARY: Election is here – lots to consider.  One thing you should not worry about is the voting machine itself

 

In August, 2020, Wired Magazine reporter Lily Hay Newman wrote this in her article entitled: Voting Machine Makers Are Finally Playing Nice With Hackers

For years, voting machines were a black box, even as more and more states replaced old analog marking systems with computerized options. The Digital Millennium Copyright Act even made it illegal for security researchers to probe voting machines for potential vulnerabilities, which only changed in 2016 with a DMCA exception for voting machine security research.

That paved the way for the program known as the Voting Village, which launched in 2017 as a way for researchers to get their hands on voting machines, likely for the first time, and start hacking them. Part of the Defcon security conference, the Voting Village has also served as a sort of town hall for debate and innovation in voting security. In 2018, ES&S sent a letter to customers downplaying the importance of the Voting Village and its findings: “Attendees will absolutely access some voting systems internal components because they will have full and unfettered access to a unit without the advantage of trained poll workers, locks, tamper-evident seals, passwords, and other security measures that are in place in an actual voting situation.”

Here with me to talk about this today is Jonathan Couch (Kooch).

Jonathan Couch is SVP of Strategy of ThreatQuotient, and has over 20 years of experience in information security, information warfare and intelligence collection. He has served in the Air Force at the NSA, Air Force Information Warfare Center, and various commercial organizations.

Welcome Jonathan!

Q: What are the different approaches to attacking election results through election machines?

  1. Mass Influence by an adversary.
  2. Local Influence: (Not including Social Media), or a person physically local attack
  3. Supply chain attack.

Things that prevent mass hacking: No internet connection

Statistical check

It would take an army attackjing multiple machines in multiple counties.

Comparing voting security to nuclear security: high tech (technology) to low tech (guards and fences)

Website: www.threatq.com

Twitter: @ThreatQuotient

Published by

David W. Schropfer

David W. Schropfer is the CEO of SAFE (Smartphone Authentication For Everyone), a cybersecurity company in New York (www.theSafe.io).  Every day, he and his team of professionals keep the people who use The SAFE Button protected from some of the most common traps, hacks and attacks that target computer systems of all sizes. David is the author of the bestselling cybersecurity book, Digital Habits: 5 Simple Tips to Help Keep You and Your Information Safe Online. His previous books, including The Smartphone Wallet and industry whitepapers, predicted some of the biggest trends in the payments, mobile, and security industries.  Since graduating Boston College, David earned an Executive MBA from the University of Miami.

One thought on “#39 – Computerized Voting Machines are Safe and Secure. Period.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.